A report should be limited to what?

A report should be limited to what?

• A. Facts
• B. Opinions
• C. Feelings
• D. Assumptions

Answer: (A)

Reports should be grounded in verifiable observations and objective details. This means sticking to facts—the observable, documented information such as who was present, what occurred, when and where it happened, what was seen or heard, and any physical evidence or records. Facts are supported by evidence and can be verified, which is essential for credibility and for use in investigations or potential court proceedings. Opinions, feelings, and assumptions don’t belong in a standard report because they are subjective and not reliably verifiable. They can introduce bias or mislead readers about what actually happened. If a judgment or interpretation is necessary, it should be clearly labeled as an assessment and tied to the facts that justify it, rather than presented as a fact. In short, the content should be the factual record.

Reports should be grounded in verifiable observations and objective details. This means sticking to facts—the observable, documented information such as who was present, what occurred, when and where it happened, what was seen or heard, and any physical evidence or records. Facts are supported by evidence and can be verified, which is essential for credibility and for use in investigations or potential court proceedings.

Opinions, feelings, and assumptions don’t belong in a standard report because they are subjective and not reliably verifiable. They can introduce bias or mislead readers about what actually happened. If a judgment or interpretation is necessary, it should be clearly labeled as an assessment and tied to the facts that justify it, rather than presented as a fact. In short, the content should be the factual record.